King v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Presiding Judge.
This appeal challenges the constitutionality of an important innovation in Texas criminal procedure.
May an individual represented by counsel voluntarily waive the formal accusation or presentment of a grand jury indictment in a non-capital felony case and agree to be charged by an information signed by the prosecuting attorney ?
Thus the question of the constitutionality of Article 1.141, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. (Acts 1971, 62nd Leg., Chpt. 260-S.B. 116, effective May 19, 1971) is presented in light of Article I, Sec. 10 of the Texas Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St.…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Duron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Riney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.