Legal Opinion
Mazak Corporation v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 29, 2009No. Slip Op. 09-124; Court 06-00393PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff Mazak Corporation (“Mazak”) is contesting the denials of Protest Nos. 3001-06-100270 and 3001-06-100272 by the United States Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”). During the administrative review period from May 1, 2003 to April 30, 2004, Mazak imported antifriction bearings into the United States that fell within the scope of the antidumping duty order, Antidumping Duty Orders: Ball Bearings, Cylindrical Roller Bearings, and Spherical Plain Bearings, and Parts Thereof from Japan (A-588-804), 54 Fed.Reg. 20,904 (Dep’t Commerce May 15, 1989). Upon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. (Surety for Carreon, Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- International Trading Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Trek Leather, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2011
- United States v. Adaptive Microsystems, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- United States v. American Home Assurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Sgl Carbon LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010