Legal Opinion
United States v. Weller
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 19, 1969No. 42614PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT.
PECKHAM, District Judge.
The Defendant has made a motion to dismiss the indictment against him pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12. Defendant contends that his constitutional rights were violated because his request to have his attorney present during the personal appearance on his conscientious objector claim was denied pursuant to 32 C.F.R. § 1624.1(b) which provides:
* * * no registrant may be represented before the Local Board by anyone acting as attorney or legal counsel.
Alternatively, the defendant contends that the section of 1624.1(b) quoted above is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Robert Edward ReebCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. WellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Claud Michael KemberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Michael Stephen FindleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- First National Bank of Abbeville v. SehrtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.