Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Edward Reeb

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1970No. 25759PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

Robert Edward Reeb appeals from his conviction for refusing to submit to induction in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462.

The Government argues that we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal because Reeb was committed for a sixty-day observation and study under 18 U.S.C. § 5010(e). Such a commitment, the Government contends, does not constitute a final decision of the district court within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We hold that such a commitment constitutes imposition of sentence insofar as appealability is concerned. See United States v. Fort, 133…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. Dennis Adrian BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Investment Co. Institute v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Steven Michael Oshatz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Nevada Power Co. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. Curry v. BlockDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API