Legal Opinion
United States v. Claud Michael Kember
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 19, 1971No. 25125_1PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
Claud Michael Kember appeals from his conviction for failing to submit to induction into the armed forces, in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462.
Kember first argues that there is no basis in fact in the agency record for classifying him I-A, subject to induction, instead of I-O, as a conscientious objector available for civilian work. 1
Kember’s application to the local board for a conscientious objector classification clearly meets the statutory cri teria for such classification. See Welsh v. United States, 398 U.S. 333, 339-340, 342-343, 90 S.Ct. 1792, 26 L.Ed.2d 308…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Lonnie Leroy HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Captain Roger G. Sanger v. Honorable Robert C. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. David Mitchell JarrattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. William Lovett JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Levine v. Selective Service Local Board No. 18Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Daniel John GuaraldiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.