Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Frohmiller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1943No. Civil No. 4645PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.

The Sixteenth Legislature on March 6, 1943, enacted chapter 26, known as the “Arizona Occupational Disease Disability Law,” and placed upon' the plaintiff the duty of putting it into effect and enforcing it. In doing this the commission rented and received a typewriter from Walsh Bros., of Phoenix, Arizona, for an agreed consideration of $4 per month beginning May 3, 1943. In order to pay the rental therefor, plaintiff filed with' defendant for audit and payment, on May 19, 1943, the original claim of Walsh Bros., duly verified and approved by it against the appropriation of $7,500, made to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Sexton ex rel. Kin v. Newark District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  4. Boshuizen v. Thompson & Taylor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Heiselt Const. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lewis v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Industrial Commission v. MeddockArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Ford v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ream v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API