Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Meddock

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1947No. 4953PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Chief Justice.

Appellee is the owner of certain sand rock quarries in Northern Arizona and had entered into individual contracts for the quarrying of said stone, and doing other work in connection therewith. The Industrial Commission of Arizona proposed to classify the men doing the actual quarrying as “employees,” appellees having classified them -as “independent contractors” thus avoiding, among other things, having to pay premiums on these men for workmen’s compensation insurance.

Upon the proposal to make such classification appellee demanded a formal hearing before the Industrial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  2. Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lee Moor Contracting Co. v. BlantonArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Consolidated Motors, Inc. v. KetchamArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Grabe v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Anton v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Blasdell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Carnes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API