Heiselt Const. Co. v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Proceeding under the "Workmen’s Compensation Act by A. E. Harvey, as administrator of the estate of David Murphy, deceased, for compensation for injuries sustained by David Murphy, opposed by the Heiselt Construction Company, employer, and the iBtna Life Insurance Company, insurer. Award of Industrial Commission for claimant, and the employer and insurance carrier bring an original action to review the proceedings of the Industrial Commission.
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.
This is an action to review the proceedings of the defendant, Industrial Commission of Utah (hereinafter called Commission) in the matter of an award made by said Commission to the estate of one David Murphy, deceased, and to have said award declared null and void. The decision of the Commission not only contains its findings of fact, conclusions of law and award, but also the reasons which induced the *61Commission to make the award. With the' view of making our opinion more intelligible we quote the decision in its entirety.
“I. The defendant employer, Heiselt Construction Company, is, and was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Wangler Boiler & Sheet Metal Works Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Smith v. Kaw Boiler Works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Smith v. Southern Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Park Utah Consolidated Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Bry-Block Merc. Co. v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Industrial Commission v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1943
- Reed v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.