Legal Opinion
Nagy v. Employees' Review Board
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1999No. SC 16003; SC 16025PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
The named plaintiffs in these two consolidated appeals, Robert A. Nagy and Hugh Barber, are assistant attorneys general of the state of Connecticut.1 In 1995, the terms of the plaintiffs’ employment were modified to increase gradually the length of their standard workday from seven to eight hours. The principal issue in these appeals is whether, pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) §§ 5-247 and 5-250,2 one day *696of sick or vacation leave earned by the plaintiffs during the time the length of the standard workday was seven hours entitles them to utilize a full day of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connecticut Ass'n of Not-for-Profit Providers for Aging v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. ReddickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Board of Trustees v. Federation of Technical College TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Burinskas v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- In re Baby Z.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Cox v. AikenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Preston v. O'RourkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Secretary of Office of Policy & Management v. Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Raymond v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.