Legal Opinion

Preston v. O'Rourke

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 24, 2002No. AC 21278PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

In this tort action, the plaintiff, Richard Preston, appeals from the summary judgment rendered *303by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Paula J. O’Rourke, on her defense that her statements were made in preparation for and as part of a quasi-judicial arbitration proceeding and thus were protected utterances and statements entitled to absolute privilege.1 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) failed to review his claim that the arbitrator lacked subject matter jurisdiction, (2) concluded that arbitration was a quasi-judicial proceeding, (3) concluded that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred PickholzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Caldor, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Massameno v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rioux v. BarrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Kahala Royal Corp. v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Craig v. Stafford Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Vargas v. DoeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Lega Siciliana Social Club, Inc. v. GermaineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API