Legal Opinion

City of Marquette v. Gaede

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 2003No. 02-1008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

Steven A. Gaede and Ruth Gaede, who claim ownership of a thirty-three-foot strip of land that the City of Marquette claims is a city street, appeal from a decree quieting title to the disputed strip in the city. The Gaedes urge that (1) the platted street that forms the basis for the city’s claim never extended far enough east to coincide with the area in dispute, (2) the city’s claim is barred by a forty-year chain of title in the Gaedes and their predecessors in interest, and (3) the city is estopped from claiming title to the disputed strip. We reject each of these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fencl v. City of Harpers FerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Kelroy v. City of Clear LakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. HENRY WALKER PARK ASSOCIATION v. MathewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Sterlane v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Town of Marne v. GoekenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baker v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James W. McgrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  3. Stecklein v. City of CascadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Gaede v. StansberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. Phipps v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API