Kelroy v. City of Clear Lake

Clear Lake is a city of the second class, bordering on a lake of the same name. Plaintiff Westfall and defendant Whitaker hold title (the validity of which is in ques-' tion) to the strip in controversy lying between the lake and the lots of the remaining plaintiffs. The lots are numbered 24 to 33 of Whitaker’s Replat of Block 3 of Clear Lake. They face the lake and are improved by cottages occupied by plaintiffs. The strip in controversy is 285 feet in length, along the lake. Plaintiff Kelroy testified the width varies from about 40 to 47 feet, from the top of the wall along the front of the…