Legal Opinion

Stecklein v. City of Cascade

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 4, 2005No. 03-0904PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The City of Cascade appeals from a district court judgment quieting title to certain platted, but unopened, streets in the appellees, Thomas and Mary Beth Stecklein. The district court ruled the city had an easement to use and maintain roads through the Steckleins’ property but lost that right by the Steckleins’ adverse possession and through the operation of Iowa’s forty-year marketable title statute, Iowa Code section 614.31 (2001). Upon our review of the record and the governing legal principles, we conclude the city holds fee title to the disputed land. Therefore, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fencl v. City of Harpers FerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Burroughs v. City of CherokeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. City of Des Moines v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Kelroy v. City of Clear LakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. Sons of the Union Veterans of the Civil War, Department of Iowa v. Griswold American Legion Post 508Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burgess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. McClurg Family Farm, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Phipps v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. City of St. Lucas v. Dennis Herbert LangreckCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019
  5. Doug Jaster and Elizabeth Jaster v. City of GarberCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API