Legal Opinion
Cunard Line Ltd. v. Abney
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 7, 1982No. 81 Civ. 4671 (WK)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
The case is before us on defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
The plaintiff, Cunard Line Limited [Cunard], is a corporation incorporated in Great Britain. On July 27, 1981, invoking the Court’s diversity jurisdiction, Cunard filed a complaint against Coopers & Lybrand [Coopers], one of the so-called “big eight” national partnerships of certified public accountants. The allegations in the complaint tell of much that had gone awry with the design and installation of a computer system which Coopers had agreed to develop for Cunard.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Marvine Markham v. City of Newport News, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Edwin Kerr v. Compagnie De Ultramar and Transmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Envirotech Corporation and Chemico Air Pollution Control Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, and Envirotech Corporation, on Counterclaim-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Alexander Grant & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Linnin v. MichielsensDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Dutch Lane AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.