State v. Maddux
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 183.010. Before trial, defendant moved to suppress the results of his field sobriety tests and all derivative evidence on the ground that both the initial stop and the scope of the officer’s investigation were unlawful. The trial court denied that motion. After that decision, but before trial, the Oregon Supreme Court held that field sobriety tests constitute a search under both Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FloresOregon Supreme Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. SteinmetzMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.