Legal Opinion
Tandy v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1962No. Civ. 20150PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered after the court sustained a demurrer to an amended complaint without leave to amend further.
In their complaint plaintiffs asked for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant city to rezone their property from “C” multiple dwelling to “E” commercial. They also sought declaratory relief, contending that the zoning ordinances of the City of Oakland are unconstitutional as applied to their property.
The complaint alleged in substance that plaintiffs owned a lot improved with a two flat building built about 1910; that the building had deteriorated with age…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Taschner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Toso v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Ensign Bickford Realty Corp. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.