Legal Opinion
In Re CRT
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 24, 2003No. 96,753Published
1Opinion of the Court
66 P.3d 1004 (2003)
2003 OK CIV APP 29
In the Matter of C.R.T., an alleged deprived child,
Gail Thomason, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
State of Oklahoma, Defendant/Appellee.
No. 96,753.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2.
February 24, 2003.
Avery A. Eeds, Jr., Elk City, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
Richard L. Dugger, District Attorney, Gina R. Farris, Assistant District Attorney, Arapaho, OK, for Defendant/Appellee.
Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2.
Opinion by KEITH RAPP, Judge:
¶ 1 The trial court defendant, Gail Thomason (Mother),…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- McNeill v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Carter v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.