Legal Opinion
Drive-In & Shop, Inc. v. Redevelopment Agency
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided May 15, 1963No. File 28351PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The only question presented by the present proceeding is the proper taxation of costs. The appellant has presented a bill of costs which totals $2216.40. No question is raised as to any item except the one “Appraiser — David C. Ma-honey Co., Inc. — $2,100.00.” The appellant claims that this is a proper element of costs. The claim is contested by the redevelopment agency.
Appellant’s right to costs arises from the provisions of § 8-133 of the General Statutes, which provides that if an applicant obtains an award from the court greater than the amount determined as compensation by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. MacKenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Condon v. Pomroy-GraceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Lew v. BraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Town of Norwich v. HydeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
3Cited by4 opinions
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Hartford v. Public Utilities CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1973
- City of Hartford v. Public Utilities CommissionPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1973