Legal Opinion

Town of Norwich v. Hyde

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 15, 1829PublishedCited by 4 opinions

IN ERROR. This was an action of assumpsit, brought originally before a justice of the peace, by Augustus Hyde, keeper of the county gaol in Norwich, against the town of Norwich, to recover for support furnished, by the plaintiff, to James Hazard and John Blake, prisoners in such gaol, from the 8th of October to the 27th of November, 1827. The declaration stated, That on the 8th of October 1827, in the town of Norwich, Hazard and Blake were severally tried for and convicted…

Read the full summary

IN ERROR. This was an action of assumpsit, brought originally before a justice of the peace, by Augustus Hyde, keeper of the county gaol in Norwich, against the town of Norwich, to recover for support furnished, by the plaintiff, to James Hazard and John Blake, prisoners in such gaol, from the 8th of October to the 27th of November, 1827. The declaration stated, That on the 8th of October 1827, in the town of Norwich, Hazard and Blake were severally tried for and convicted of a breach of the peace in.that town, before Asa Roath, Esq., a justice of the peace for New-London county, and were…

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The question arising upon this record, is simply, whether the town of Norwich is liable to the gaoler for the support of a person not an inhabitant, — who has been convicted of a breach of the peace in that town, and ordered to pay a *533fine to the treasury of the town of Norwich, and finally discharged by one of the select-men of the town of Norwich.

The support of the poor in every community must be by voluntary aid, or under positive enactments of the legislature. A town, a"s such, is under no more obligation ' to support (he poor in it, than a county, or parish, or school district. That it is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tyler v. Inhabitants of BrooklynSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Drive-In & Shop, Inc. v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
  2. Hartford v. Public Utilities CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1973
  3. Cary v. DuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  4. City of Hartford v. Public Utilities CommissionPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API