Legal Opinion
Hartford v. Public Utilities Commission
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 20, 1973No. File No. 106824PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On November 5, 1971, the defendant The Southern New England Telephone Company, hereinafter called SNETCO, under Docket No. 11200 filed a proposed amendment of its rate schedule with the defendant public utilities commission, hereinafter called PUC, in accordance with § 16-19 of the General Statutes. After holding hearings on the proposed rates, the PUC authorized an increase. The city of Hartford, hereinafter called Hartford, appealed from this order and on May 8, 1972, obtained ex parte from a judge of this court "[p]ursuant to Section 16-39 of the General Statutes, as amended," an "Order of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- East Side Civic Assn. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- City of Waterbury v. MacKenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- General Realty Improvement Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Boltuch v. RainaudSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Case v. Hermitage Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Cheshire Convalescent Center v. Comm. on HospitalsConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
- Cheshire Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CarePennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1977