Hale v. State

Dillard, Judge.

Walter Douglas Hale was convicted by a jury on one count of passing in a no-passing zone 1 and one count of driving under the influence less-safe. 2 Hale appeals his convictions, arguing that the trial court erred by (1) denying his motion to suppress the results of an alco-sensor test conducted prior to receiving his Miranda warnings and (2) informing the jury as to the existence of excluded evidence during preliminary instructions. For the reasons noted infra, we reject these arguments and affirm Hale’s convictions.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, 3…