Legal Opinion

American Council of Certified Podiatric Physicians & Surgeons v. American Board of Podiatric Surgery, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1999No. Nos. 96-2529, 96-2530, 97-1223 and 97-1224PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff American Council of Certified Podiatrie Physicians and Surgeons (“ACCPPS”) brought claims under the Sherman Act, the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act, the Lanham Act, and the common law prohibition against intentional interference with prospective economic advantage against the American Board of Podiatrie Surgery, Inc., (“ABPS”) and the American Podiatrie Medical Association (“APMA”). Plaintiff appeals the district court’s partial grant of defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the grant of the ABPS’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Council Of Certified Podiatric Physicians And Surgeons v. American Board Of Podiatric Surgery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. ADT, LLC v. Capital Connect, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
  3. Plastic Molded Technologies, Inc. v. Cinpres Gas Injection Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API