Legal Opinion

Plastic Molded Technologies, Inc. v. Cinpres Gas Injection Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 22, 2003No. 02-72481Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Plastic Molded Technologies, Inc. commenced this suit in this Court on June 13, 2002, asserting federal and state-law unfair competition claims arising from an alleged strategy by Defendants Cinpres Gas Injection Ltd. and Cinpres Gas Injection Inc. to misrepresent their rights to license the use of a so-called “overflow wells” process of gas-assisted plastic injection molding. This Court’s jurisdiction rests upon Plaintiffs assertion of a claim under § 43(a) of the federal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Richardson-Vicks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API