Legal Opinion

Wells v. East 10th Street Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered on or about December 6, 1993, which granted defendant’s motion for sum*432mary judgment and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although defendant landlord was initially granted summary judgment in a summary proceeding, which decision was affirmed, without opinion, by the Appellate Term, we reversed based on the Court of Appeals subsequent decision in Braschi v Stahl Assocs. Co. (74 NY2d 201) and ordered defendant to issue plaintiff a renewal lease (East 10th St. Assocs. v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Nesbitt v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. East 10th Street Associates v. Estate of Stuart GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Feierstein v. MoserNew York Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. 245 Realty Associates v. SussisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Matter of 251 CPW Hous. LLC v. PastreichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Kralik v. 239 East 79th Street Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Roxborough Apartments Corp. v. BeckerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
  5. 72A Realty Associates v. LucasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API