Legal Opinion
Nesbitt v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
Petitioners Nesbitt and Eaton and intervenor Tenants’ Association move for an assessment of the reasonable value of their counsel fees in this article 78 proceeding.
Petitioners were rent-stabilized tenants in premises owned and operated by respondent St. John’s in the Village (St. John’s) a religious institution. In 1979, St. John’s informed petitioners that their apartments were not subject to rent stabilization since it was exempt under section 5 (subd a, par [6]) of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (L 1974, ch 576, § 4). When St.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gair v. PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- First National Bank v. BrowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Eaton v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Dolman v. United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Elkins v. Cinera Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Feierstein v. MoserNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Jacreg Realty Corp. v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Fairbanks Gardens Co. v. GandhiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1996
- Wells v. East 10th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Msibi v. JRD Management Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.