Legal Opinion
Feierstein v. Moser
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1984PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Evans, J.
Defendant, a loft tenant, here renews his application for attorneys’ fees after successfully defending an ejectment *370action. At issue is the applicability of section 234 of the Real Property Law to an interim multiple dwelling occupant as defined by the “Loft Law” (Multiple Dwelling Law, § 280 et seq.)-
On November 1, 1979, defendant Moser took occupancy of the third floor loft at 19 Mercer Street under an agreement1 with both the father of the deceased tenant of record, and the then landlord and plaintiff’s predecessor, M & A Freiman Realty Corp. At the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Elkins v. Cinera Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Duane Thomas Loft Tenants Ass'n v. Sylvan Lawrence Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- Nesbitt v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Taylor v. Eli Haddad Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- Deary v. KeithCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Duell v. CondonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Cier Industries Co. v. HessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kumble v. Windsor Plaza Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Wells v. East 10th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- 640 Broadway Renaissance Co. v. RossiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.