Legal Opinion
72A Realty Associates v. Lucas
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 1, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order, dated May 25, 2010, modified to deny tenant’s application for attorney’s fees, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.
Landlord commenced this holdover summary proceeding in September 2008, based upon allegations that tenant’s lease agreement for the purportedly unregulated apartment expired by its own terms on August 31, 2008. Specifically, the petition alleged that the “apartment was decontrolled and became subject to the market rate because of a high rent vacancy that occurred on March 1, 2001.” Upon the parties’ respective cross *49motions, Civil Court, among…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Grimm v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gurnee v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Thornton v. BaronNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- 89 Christopher Inc. v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Gersten v. 56 7th Avenue LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Latipac Corp. v. BMH Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Sixth Lenox Terrace Associates v. SchneiderCivil Court of the City of New York · 2012