Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Cohen

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Tessler, J.

Motion by the defendant to dismiss each of the two canses of action set forth in the plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that neither states, facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Both parties are dentists duly licensed to practice their profession in the State of New York. It is alleged in the first cause of action that in January, 1954, the defendant became associated with the plaintiff in the practice of dentistry in the plaintiff’s office and that they made an agreement in May, 1954 to be associated in such practice “in a joint venture”; that on May 12, 1954, the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Cowee v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Barnard v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. In re MerrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API