Isaacs v. Washougal Clothing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.
We have before us, in each of the above actions, a motion which is addressed not only to the form but to the sufficiency of the complaint.
*569With a minor exception, which will be referred to later, the complaint in each case is identical down to the demand for judgment. On the selfsame allegations plaintiffs seek entirely dissimilar relief. Action No. 1 is brought to recover treble damages alleged to have been sustained because the plaintiffs were ejected and put out of real property in a forcible manner. In action No. 2 respondents ask for a declaratory judgment, decreeing that a certain deed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dinkelspiel v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Newton v. Livingston County Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Compton v. . "The Chelsea"New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hatch v. MatthewsNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Stabilimento Metallurgico Ligure v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Grobman v. FreimanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Barsella v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Joseph v. ErvolinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Cohen v. Pyramid Bond & Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Kasen v. MorrellNew York Supreme Court · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.