Legal Opinion
Hoenisch v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 2001No. 233 MAP 1999PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAYLOR, Justice.
In this case we consider whether a conviction pursuant to the provision in the North Carolina Impaired Driving Statute, prohibiting the operation of a motor vehicle when the driver has a blood alcohol content of .08 percent or more, provides a sufficient basis for a reciprocal driver’s license suspension in Pennsylvania.
On March 21, 1997, Appellant Roy Hoenisch (“Hoenisch”) was stopped by a state trooper in North Carolina for driving in excess of the posted speed limit. Following the stop, Hoenisch was arrested and charged with impaired driving under North Carolina’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MikulanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Petrovick v. COM., DEPT OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Petrovick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Scott v. COM., BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Phillips v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Kulp v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIONCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Schofield v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Barnas v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.