Barnas v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Respectfully, I do not agree that the en banc opinion of the Commonwealth Court in this matter should be affirmed per *663curiam. Instead, an order reversing that Court is warranted, with instruction that this Court’s decision in Schrankel controls.1 Therefore, I must dissent.

This matter involves the Driver’s License Compact, 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1581-1586, in particular suspension of a driver’s license based upon a driving under the influence (DUI) offense and conviction in the state of New York. Appellant Barnas was charged in New York with DUI on September 23, 2003, and convicted of that offense in…