Legal Opinion
Scott v. COM., BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 20, 2002No. 8, 9, and 10 MAP 2001PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIGRO, Justice.
In these consolidated appeals, Appellants Jarrett Carl Scott, Mathew S. Liero and Robert P. Neenan appeal from the orders of the Commonwealth Court affirming the dismissal of their statutory appeals from a one-year suspension of their driver’s licenses. At issue is whether the Pennsylvania De partment of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (“PennDOT”) met its burden of proving that Appellants’ convictions for violating New Jersey’s driving while intoxicated (“DWI”) statute, N.J.S.A. § 39:4-50(a), are substantially similar to conduct proscribed by Article IV(a)(2)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Sullivan v. COM. DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Harrington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Petrovick v. COM., DEPT OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- 3D Trucking v. Wcab (Fine and Anthony)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- 3d Trucking Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Phillips v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Integrated Behavioral Health Services v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.