Liberty Oil Corp. v. Crowley, Milner & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson Sharpe, J.
The plaintiff corporation was organized in 1918 by Emil Mettetal. He and his wife had all of the stock therein except one share held by his attorney, John P. Jordan. Its purpose was to engage in the sale of lubricating oils. It adopted the trade-mark “Liberty oils and greases,” with a representation of the statue of liberty placed thereon. The sales, with a few exceptions, were made in the counties north of Wayne, usually spoken of as “the thumb,” and on the personal solicitation of Mettetal. It did no refining. Orders were sent in to a number of different refining companies and shipments…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Regis v. H. A. Jaynes & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Good Housekeeping Shop v. SmitterMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- W. B. Manufacturing Co. v. RubensteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Wood v. PefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. RosenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Coca-Cola Co. v. ChristopherDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1941
- A. C. E., Inc. v. Ace Specialties Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947