Legal Opinion
Wood v. Peffer
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 26, 1942No. Civ. 6701PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J. pro tem.
Unfair competition. Plaintiff recovered judgment for $923.61, because of profits diverted from her business, and was granted an injunction. Defendant prosecutes this appeal from said judgment. For convenience, the parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant.
There is practically no conflict in the evidence, and the facts may be summarized as follows:
The plaintiff, Bertha Wood, ever since the 17th day of April, 1939, has been the administratrix of the estate of her late husband, H. L. Wood, who, during his lifetime, conducted, at 2947—35th Street, in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- J. C. Penney Co. v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Dodge Stationery Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Audio Fidelity, Inc., a Corporation v. High Fidelity Recordings, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- National Van Lines, a Corporation v. Alfred E. Dean, Trading Under the Firm Name of National Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.