Farvour v. Geltis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
This case arises out of a particularly aggravated tort. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, were tenants of defendant Geltis, living with their three children in an apartment rented from Geltis. Geltis and his wife lived in the same apartment building. On or about July 30, 1945, defendant Ernstan appeared at the plaintiffs’ apartment and removed nine windows and several doors from the apartment, stating that Mrs. Geltis had sent him.
On August 2, a supervisor and inspector from the San Francisco Health Department gave notice in writing to defendant Geltis ordering him to replace the windows within…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wilkinson v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Plotnik v. RosenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Phillips v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
3Cited by13 opinions
- Finney v. LockhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Will v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Aweeka v. BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Loope v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- CRST, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.