Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Gonzales
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 1941No. Civ. 11579PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. Later it entered a judgment that the plaintiff take nothing by this action. From that judgment the plaintiff has appealed.
On the 4th day of December, 1938, at a point about one-half mile south of San Benito River bridge, on Highway 101, the plaintiff’s automobile collided with another automobile being driven by August Gonzales. For his personal injuries and also for injuries to his automobile the plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages. He pleaded his cause of action in two counts. The first cause…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Swan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Clark v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- George v. McManusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cooper v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Loope v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Farvour v. GeltisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Baker Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. CasselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962