Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1983No. Crim. 44060PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.

The People appeal from the sentence pronounced in a felony case. We affirm the judgment.

Defendant was charged with robbery, in violation of section 211 of the Penal Code. Two prior convictions for robbery were also alleged. Defendant pled nolo contendere to the robbery charge and admitted the two priors. He was sentenced to the upper term of five years on the robbery; the trial court stayed imposition of sentence on the two priors.

On this appeal, the People contend that imposition of sentence on the priors was mandatory. We disagree.

Section 667 of the Penal Code,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. LeeverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. People v. ChagollaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API