Legal Opinion

People v. Price

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1984No. Crim. 6459PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDREEN, J.

This appeal presents several complex sentencing issues arising from multiple convictions for both violent sex offenses and nonsex offenses. In the published portion of the opinion, we hold that the same fact may not be used to both impose an upper term and to justify full, separate and consecutive (full-force consecutive) sentences under Penal Code section 667.6, subdivision (c). Also, a single factor in aggravation, if applicable to each of several offenses, may be used to justify selection of the upper term as to each provided the fact is reasonably related to each…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. People v. ChismCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. HennesseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API