Legal Opinion

Jaeger's Sanitary Woolen System Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1921No. 3073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 43841.

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Shawls composed of wool, knitted in imitation of lace, were classified and assessed by the collector under paragraph 358 of the tariff act of 1913 at 60 per cent ad valorem as wearing apparel made wholly or in part of lace of any kind.

The importer protested, claiming classification under paragraph 291 of the act, which provides for a duty of 35 per cent ad valorem.

No oral testimony was offered before the Board of General Appraisers, but the facts necessary to present the issue were embodied in the papers sent to it by the collector and in a stipulation of counsel. Thereupon the board…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Montello Salt Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Carlowitz v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Hiller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  4. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  5. Microutsicos v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Caplan v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Jack Bryan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API