Legal Opinion
AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Padgett (In Re Padgett)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 20, 2009No. BAP No. KS-08-069. Bankr.No. 07-41284PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MICHAEL, Bankruptcy Judge.
Creditor AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (“AmeriCredit”) appeals the *376bankruptcy court’s order confirming the Chapter 13 plan of Timothy John Padgett and Tracie Arlene Padgett (“Debtors”). AmeriCredit asserts that the bankruptcy court erred when it allowed Debtors to bifurcate and cram down its 910 vehicle claim under 11 U.S.C. §§ 506 & 1325(a)(5), notwithstanding the addition of the “hanging paragraph” to § 1325(a) by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”). We agree with AmeriCredit, and reverse the bankruptcy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Till v. SCS Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re O.J. OSBORN and Roma Lou Osborn, Debtors. O.J. OSBORN and Roma Lou Osborn, Appellants, v. DURANT BANK & TRUST COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ford v. Ford Motor Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Dykstra Exterior, Inc. v. Nestlen (In Re Nestlen)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- In Re WhippleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2009
- In Re MoreyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Padgett (In Re Padgett)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.