Legal Opinion

In Re Whipple

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided September 21, 2009No. 09-80090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS L. PERKINS, Chief Judge.

Negative equity in a trade-in vehicle rolled over into a purchase money loan gives rise to an issue of statutory construction regarding the hanging paragraph. Most courts use state law to define “purchase money security interest.” This Court agrees with the minority position that Congress intended the hanging paragraph to be interpreted as a matter of federal law so that “purchase money security interest” is accorded a uniform federal definition.

In their Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan, the Debtors, David and Sally Whipple (DEBTORS), propose to strip down…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. In re WillisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API