Legal Opinion

Dialysis Patient Citizens v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 19, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-1664Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) DIALYSIS PATIENT CITIZENS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-1664 (TSC) ) ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of Health ) and Human Services, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Dialysis Patient Citizens (“DPC”), DaVita Inc. (“DaVita”), Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America, and U.S. Renal Care, Inc. have sued Alex M. Azar II (Secretary of Health and Human Services), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API