Legal Opinion
Pinnacle Holdings, Inc. v. Simon
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1995No. B078275PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
Four tenants of a mobilehome park protested the park owner’s request for a rental increase. This exercise of free speech and right to protest resulted in their being named as defendants in the park owner’s action against the city for failure to grant the total relief requested. Do the tenants have to remain in the lawsuit and represent unwillingly the rest of the mobilehome park tenants? They do not.
Pinnacle Holdings, Inc. (Pinnacle), appeals from judgments of dismissal in favor of respondents Patty Cau and Harold Simon following the court’s sustaining respondents’…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Caro v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Osborne v. Subaru of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tucker v. Pacific Bell Mobile ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Silva v. BlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Yee v. Mobilehome Park Rental Review BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Country Side Villas Homeowners Ass'n v. IvieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Crawley v. Alameda County Waste Management AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.