Legal Opinion

Groening v. Nowlen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1963No. Calendar 103, Docket 49,697PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, C. J.

For several years prior to June 24, 1960, plaintiff herein was employed by defendant Grattan L. Nowlen as a bookkeeper. As such employee it appears that he appropriated to his own use funds belonging to the employer, the amount thereof being in dispute. Such conduct resulted in plaintiff being requested by police officers of the city of St. Joseph to accompany them to the municipal jail where the situation was discussed at some length for a period of approximately 5 hours. It appears that in the course of the conversation plaintiff admitted the taking of money, but denied the amount…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buck v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Koons v. VauconsantMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hanson v. LoescherMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wilhelm v. King Auto Finance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eloise Fomby-Denson v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Quinio v. AalaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  4. Balcom v. ZambonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Bank of New York v. University Partners, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API