Legal Opinion

Koons v. Vauconsant

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Clinton; Stone, J. Bill by Solomon D. Koons and Catherine E. Koonsagainst Justina Vauconsant to obtain the discharge of a. mortgage alleged to have been given under duress. From a decree for complainants, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The complainants pray a decree discharging a mortgage given by them under alleged duress. Their claim is that on January 2, 1900, defendant’s son and his lawyer called at the home of the complainants, and presented a note, which purported to bear the signature of their son, E. S. Koons, and his father, Solomon D. Koons, ■one of the complainants, which note bore date November '27,- 1896. Solomon stated to them that they had made •such a note in 1892, but that he had not made a second note; that his signature was not upon the note presented, nor had he ever authorized any one to sign his name…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Home Life Insurance v. ElwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Tate ex rel. Fleming v. StevensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Stevenson v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Rogers v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Sweet v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Union Exchange National Bank v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. E. P. Wilbur Trust Co. v. FahrendorfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. WidmayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Groening v. NowlenMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API