Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. King Auto Finance Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 136, Calendar No. 36,465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

I think the decree entered in the circuit court should be affirmed, and that sufficient reasons therefor are set forth in the following portion of the opinion filed by the circuit judge:

"The court is of the opinion that the transaction in question is not subject to being voided for the reason that the defendants' mortgage was obtained by duress. There does not seem to the court to have been any bad faith in what was done with relation to Wilhelm. He undoubtedly was guilty, and he and his family undoubtedly sought to make restitution with a view to having the proceedings dropped. The…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Groening v. NowlenMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API