Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen W. Hobbs

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1971No. 71-1054PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

This is a selective service case wherein Hobbs seeks reversal of a judgment and sentence entered by the trial court on the verdict of a jury finding Hobbs guilty of wilfully and knowingly failing to report for and submit to an armed forces physical examination in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. Hobbs contends that the judgment and sentence should be reversed for the reason that (1) the Military Selective Service Act of 1967 is unconstitutional and (2) the instruction given by the trial court defining “wil-fully and knowingly” was improper.

The Government initially…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. United States v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. Richard Mather BoardmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  5. Frederic Wayne Etcheverry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Emery v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Soucy v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. United States v. Roger Pete MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Emery v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API