Legal Opinion

United States v. Roger Pete Medina

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1972No. 72-1198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Roger Pete Medina, the appellant, was convicted by a jury of a violation of 50 App. U.S.C. § 462(a), the failure and neglect to report and submit to induction into the armed forces of the United States. He was sentenced and appeals contending that the evidence of “knowingly” and “wilfully” failing to report and submit was insufficient, and that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of his efforts to join the United States Army. We affirm.

The pertinent background facts begin with Medina’s registration with the Selective Service in 1967, and his being placed on probation in 1968 as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glen Woodson Palmer, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. David Seymour Graves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Ellis Thayer Van Nattan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Robert Thomas Ebey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. Jeral Bliss Nickerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Bruce Ogilvie IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Bruce Ogilvie IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Bruce Ogilvie IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API