Legal Opinion
Schrank v. Philibeck
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.
The loss occurred in the state of. Michigan, and the Michigan law applicable is contained in Act 181, Michigan Public Acts of 1919, as amended. The pertinent sections follow:
“Sec. 6. . . . no domestic animal liable to become infected with the disease or capable of communicating the same shall be permitted to enter or leave the district, premises or ground so quarantined. . , . ”
“Sec. 10. No person having in his possession any domestic animal affected with any contagious, infectious or communicable disease, knowing such animal to be so affected, shall permit the same to run at large; or shall…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States Smelting Co. v. SisamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- Milwaukee Masons & Builders' Ass'n v. NiezerowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Decker v. McSorleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Gould v. Merrill Railway & Lighting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meadolake Foods, Inc. v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- McAleavy v. LoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Strauel v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Cloakey v. BouslogWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Schrubbe v. Peninsula Veterinary Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.