Legal Opinion

Gould v. Merrill Railway & Lighting Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1909PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Lincoln ■county: Almon A. Helms, Judge. Among other references upon the part of the appellant were the following: Rideout v. Winnebago T. Qo. 123 Wis. 297, 101 N. W. 672; O’Brien v. G., St. R., M. & O. R. Go. 102 Wis. 628, 78 N. W. 1084; Gawley v. La Grosse Gity R. Go. 101 Wis. 145, 77 N. W. 179; Walters v. G., M. & St. P. R. •Go. 104 Wis. 251, 80 N. W. 451; Gollins v. Janesville, 117 Wis. 415, 94 N. W. 309; Weed & G. Mfg.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Lincoln ■county: Almon A. Helms, Judge. Among other references upon the part of the appellant were the following: Rideout v. Winnebago T. Qo. 123 Wis. 297, 101 N. W. 672; O’Brien v. G., St. R., M. & O. R. Go. 102 Wis. 628, 78 N. W. 1084; Gawley v. La Grosse Gity R. Go. 101 Wis. 145, 77 N. W. 179; Walters v. G., M. & St. P. R. •Go. 104 Wis. 251, 80 N. W. 451; Gollins v. Janesville, 117 Wis. 415, 94 N. W. 309; Weed & G. Mfg. Go. v. Whitcomb, 101 Wis. 226, 77 N. W. 175; Whereatt v. Worth, 108 Wis. 291, 84 N. W. 441; DutJiie v. Washburn, 87 Wis.…

1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.

The plaintiffs in this action, founded upon alleged negligence of defendant, had a special verdict finding the motorman in charge of defendant’s car negligent; that this negligefice was the proximate cause of the injury to plaintiffs’ horses, wagons, and harness; that the plaintiffs were free from contributory negligence and their damages were $450. Considering the commonplace nature of the action and the amount involved, the litigation seems to have been conducted with such zeal, industry, and pugnacity from the selection of the jury to the final taxation of costs as to present an unusual…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. CappierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Du Cate v. Town of BrightonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Anderson v. Chicago Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Oates v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. Nass v. SchulzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Bentson v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Nashban Barrel & Container Co. v. G. G. Parsons Trucking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. WhatleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Miller v. Economy Hog & Cattle Powder Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API